Skip to main content

STKI Summit 2010: When do we need to find the right balance?


On March 16th I participated in the STKI summit by the local analysts company STKI.
The company headed by Dr. Jimmy Schwarzkopf is focused on the Israeli market. The theme of this year conference was: Finding the Right Balance: Standardize vs. Innovate.
Presentations were based on an Israeli market survey performed by the company.
The company's analysts' presentations topics were Infrastructure Trends, Applications Trends, Office of the CIO trends and Infrastructure Services Trends, followed by wrap-up IT Trends presentation by Jimmy.

Jimmy's Keynote presentation included two parts: The first topic (and the more interesting topic in my opinion) was directions and trends. This part was not Israeli market centric.
The second topic summed up the surrey's results and was limited to the Israeli market. The local companies in each category (e.g. Storage Hardware, Integration Software), were ranked by Revenue and Client's Mind Share.
I was surprised to find myself appearing in 11th place in the Infrastructure related Consulting/Analysts.             

The most important changes according to Jimmy and according to IT leaders (Microsoft's CEO Steve Balmer, SAP's co-founder Hasso Plattner, Steve Jobs) and Academy researchers (Andrew McAfee, Zygmunt Bauman, Rakesh Khurana) quoted by him are:
  •     Mobile world with emphasis on new sophisticated devices (e.g. iPhone, iPad etc.)
  •     Home User Centric IT – The home users are Beta "site" for new software instead of organizations.
  •     Enterprise 3.0 focused on Competitive advantage in addition to Enterprise 2.0 focused on Business Processes transformation.
  •   Event Driven IT systems

The result of the combination of all these changes will be a very dynamic and flexible (Liquid) IT World with almost no boundaries between Private Life and work activities.

The theme of finding the right balance implies loosing the balance found few years ago. The first part of the Keynote presentation describes a fundamental change taking place following last year's recession.
No doubt, that the predicted change is a radical change. A new world will necessarily require a new balance. Finding the new balance is not an easy task. The new balance will not be limited to IT, because the new world implies change in organizational and cultural issues in addition to the IT changes.

My Take

  •     The New IT implies higher degree of Complexity.
The illustration copied from Jimmy's presentation depicts this problem.
Enterprise with large variety of End User Devices, Events handling mechanisms in addition to Processes, Services, Components and programs, and deploying some Core Systems in its Data Center and other Core Systems in the Cloud will be more complex than current enterprises. 

Handling the growing Complexity is a must. Complexity could be handled by hiding it (e.g. by using Abstraction in SOA or Virtualization implementations) or by actually reducing it by less heterogeneous platforms and applications.
  •     Perceptual Adaptation is the key for competitive advantage.
The adaptation required in 2010 is very different from the adaptation which was required when Forrester Research coined the term Adaptive Organization.
  •     Mobility is a significant trend. The effects of lack of time or place separation between Work related activities and other activities are beyond computing or IT.
  •     In my opinion the other significant trend is Event Driven. Reality is Event Driven. Until the last years IT systems modeled Systems and Processes, but did not model systematically events processing.
 Event Driven is closely related to SOA, Mobility and Real Time Enterprise.
The second generation of SOA implementations includes concurrent implementation of Event Driven Architecture (EDA).

Implementing Real Time Enterprise requires Event Processing, because in many cases business events processing take place immediately after an event (or State Transition) occurred.
Mobility, enables alerting a consumer or an employee immediately after an event occurs.

Comments

Einat Shimoni said…
Hello Avi,
Thank you for this interesting post!
I think that definately the complexity that CIOs will need to handle is growing and furthermore: it is not a complexity that they "already know". In most cases, it is a new kind of complexity that is caused by new technologies such as Cloud. For example, SaaS is a shift in the way organizations are consuming software services. Among the many positive advantages of SaaS, it also means that CIOs / IT organizations will need to handle a "new kind" of integration challenge: how do you integrate these "SaaS" islands? how do you integrate SaaS apps with legacy apps? what are the data management implications? while there are technical solutions to every question, these are new architecture issues that have to be dealt with.
Furthermore, BPM is redefining the way new processes are planned, executed, refined, and maintained over time... so everything is changing. No doubt, complexity is growing and the IT role is changing.

Thanks,
Einat

Popular posts from this blog

The mainframe: still alive and kicking

Recently, I was interviewed by  Pcon   (unfortunately the link points to an Hebrew only site) as part of debriefing on Legacy Systems.  Pcon is an Israeli company investigating IT topics by quoting professional articles and interviewing experts. They publish the results of the investigations including practical recommendations. This post is mainly about topics raised by me during the interview, but not included in the debriefing, which will be published.    What are Legacy Systems? The term Legacy Systems refers to old application systems and/or veteran technologies still in use.  Usually, the term Legacy Systems is associated with: 1. Mainframe Hardware e.g. IBM System z and its Operating Systems or Proprietary Servers and Operating Systems such as HP Alpha and OpenVMS Operating System, IBM AS/400 and OS/400   Operating System. 2. Development and Production Environments, e.g. COBOL , Natural and DBMS systems such as Adabas  ...

Will Business and IT Aligned?

For decades we are talking about closing the gap between business and IT , but the gap is still as wide as it was. In the beginning of the ERP era, we focused on aligning Business Processes and Core Systems, but in most enterprises we failed. SOA was the next alignment promise: defining the SOA Services in Business boundaries instead of Technical boundaries, should narrow the gap. However, despite of SOA Business Value ( Agility and Reuse )  in most enterprises,  the large Business-IT Gap remained as large as it was.  The IT Community aimed at the next alignment attempt: SOA is technical and BPM is its Business related complement.  Will the current BPM based alignment attempt succeed? I do not know, but Nick Heath's article  titled: Stop doing what the vendors tell you, CIOs told , published in  Tech Republic , suggests that the root of the problem is not Technological .   Stop Doing What the vendors Tell You Nick Heath's article is based ...

Vendors Survival: Will Software AG Survive until 2019?

This post is another post in the Vendors Survival series following posts on Microsoft , Google , HP , Sun and EMC . On July 14 th Software AG and IDS Scheer announced that Software AG is going to take over IDS Scheer . The intended acquisition is an opportunity to add another post in my Vendors Survival posts series. A brief history of Software AG Mainframe products Software AG is larger than any German software company except SAP . It was established in the Mainframe age (in 1969). I worked with many customers, who used and some of them are still using, its two flagship products Adabas and Natural . Although these products support many platforms, their main platform is IBM Mainframe. Adabas is a database and Natural is a development environment. Like other pairs of Database and Development Environment in the mainframe environment (e.g. Ideal and Datacom , Mantis and Supra) build by the same vendor, they are tied together. As a result, although it is possible t...