Skip to main content

Will Google Survive until 2021? Revisited - part 1

Three years ago I wrote one of my Vendors Survival posts. The post was titled: Vendors Survival: Will Google Survive until 2018?
The Vendors Survival posts analyze the probability that vendors will survive for at least ten years. Most of them are about leading vendors such as Apple, Microsoft, HP, EMC etc. The previous post was on Zapthink, a small SOA and Cloud Analysts and Consultants company acquired by Dovel Systems.


Ten years predictions are usually inaccurate. However,
The only leading vendor I predicted that will not survive was SUN Microsystems, who was shortly afterwards an acquisition target for IBM and acquired by Oracle.


I recently read Google's announcement about shutting down some of its products and a similar announcement  about other products.
Shutting down products and services looks like a sign of weakening.


Some people argue that Google Social Software initiatives like Buzz, Jaiko and Google+ fails to compete with Facebook or Twitter.


Others focus on limitations of current Google Search Engine. Two examples: Why we desperately need  a New (and Better) Google, Trouble in the House of Google




Few months ago Larry Page replaced Eric Schmidt as Google's CEO. Was that change a sign that Google is no longer as successful as it was?  
So will Google preserve its position as a leader? Will it Survive for Long Term?


Google 2008 vs. Google 2011
Google of 2011 is very different from Google of 2008.
It is competing with Apple in the Smart Phone Operating Systems market with its Android (The market share of each of them is approximately 40%). 


After acquiring Motorola Mobility division it is no more Software only company but also a Smart Phones Hardware vendor. 


On the one hand Google become a successful player in the browsers market with Chrome and Gmail is a de-facto standard in the Consumer market and competing with Microsoft's Exchange in Enterprises.


On the other hand its attempts to compete with Facebook and Twitter in the Electronic Social Networking Services market are still unsuccessful.    


Threats
In order to conclude if Google will survive until 2021 we have to examine threats that could change Google's position for the Long Term. 
I do think that the threats mentioned in the post I wrote about Google Survival in 2008 are relevant. In this post I discuss or mention them briefly. 


Threat 1: Significantly better Search Engine developed by another company
The issue of Web Search Engines will be discussed in part 2 of the post.


Threat 2: Loosing its innovative spirit
The section titles: Google 2008 vs. Google 2011 indicates that probably Google is still an innovative company.


Threat 3: Expanding its business domains wrongly
Google is expanding its business domains and its business services. I do not identify indicators of wrong expansion.
Stopping business services is the other side of the coin. I do not think that Google announcement of shutting services cited in the beginning of that post is an indication of wrong strategy.


An old proverb says: The only people who never make mistakes are those who are doing nothing.
Shutting an unsuccessful service is an indication of Agile and Adapting company. Its a lot better than supporting it for years. 


Shutting a bunch of strategic services could imply a wrong strategy. However, as far as Google is concerned, it is not the case. 




Threat 4: Legal issues
This issue continues to be a relevant issue.


Threat 5: Web X.0 (X > 2)
This issue of Web Content will be discussed in a part 2 of the post, which will be published soon. 


Threat 6: failure of the simple and effective Google 
Business model
I do not observe indicators supporting failure of Google's business model.
There is a growing anxiety concerning Privacy because Google hosts more and more private data in order to select adequate advertisement.




Searching the Web 
Search Engine is Google's most strategic product. Some of its other products are using it as component of the services they provide. 


Limitation or failure of it, as described in Why we desperately need a New (and Better) Google cited in the beginning of this post, could negatively affect Google's market position.


This is the major challenge facing Google. Google has no Control of some of the factors limiting its effectiveness. 


Because addressing this challenge is so important for Google, I will dedicate a post to it. The post which will be titled same as the current post with the suffix part 2  will be published until next weekend.






Comments

Avi Rosenthal said…
Group: CXO in Israel (CEO, VP, CIO, COO, CTO, CMO, CSO, CFO, GM)
Discussion: Will Google Survive until 2021? Revisited - part 1
היי אבי חג שמח!

פוסט מעניין מאד.

גוגל אכן היא היא חברה סופר חדשנית ואני מסכימה איתך שהעובדה שהיא החליטה לרדת מהחלק מהמוצרים שלה היא חלק בלתי נפרד מהחדשנות שלה אי אפשר לצפות שכול המוצרים יצליחו ונכון להפסיקם במידה והם אינם מצליחים.

עם זאת נראה שגוגל לא הצליחה בשנים האחרונות לייצר מנועי צמיחה חדשים והקניה של מוטורולה מובייל מראה שהיא מנסה לשנות את הכיוון האסטרטגי שלה ולהפוך לחברת תוכנה וחומרה גם יחד . משימה שהיא בהחלט לא פשוטה מצד שני היא גם מתחרה עם פייסבוק ופיתחה את גוגל פלוס.

נראה שגוגל צריכה להחליט באיזה ביזנס היא ומי המתחרות שלה. מחקר של ביין מראה בברור שחברות אשר מתרכזות בעסקי הליבה שלהן מצליחות ליצור צמיחה הרבה יותר מחברות אשר מתפזרות ויתכן שגוגל התפזרה על יותר מידי תחומים ונושאים.

גוגל תשרוד אם תעצב מיקוד אסטרטגי ויכולת לרכז את המאמצים של בפיתוח מוצרים חדשים ו או רכישות אשר יעצבו את הצמיחה שלה בשנים הבאות.

האם לדעתך גוגל תוכל לפתח יכולת יכולת להפוך לחברת תוכנה וחומרה כמו שאפל עשתה ?

חג שמח
נאוה
Posted by Nava
Avi Rosenthal said…
ראשית, רציתי לציין שפוסט זה הוא רק חלק א' ועד סוף שבוע הבא יפורסם חלק ב'. שני החלקים עשויים לתת תמונה מלאה יותר מאשר החלק הראשון שקראת.
גם מהחלק הראשון שפורסם אפשר להבין שיש לגוגל בעיות, שהתבטאו גם בהחלפת המנכ"ל. ההתרשמות שלי היא שרכישת מוטורולה מובייל אינה צעד אסטרטגי שתכליתו הפיכתה גם לחברת חומרה אלא מהלך שמקורו במלחמות פטנטים בשוק המובייל. צריך לזכור שגם מתחרים בולטים בשוק חומרת הטלפונים החכמים משתמשים במערכת ההפעלה אנדרואיד של גוגל מה שיוצר תחרות בתחום החומרה בין גוגל ושותפותיה העסקיות מודל לא פשוט לניהול אסטרטגי. כמו כן האסטרטגיה של גוגל הייתה פתיחות לכל הפלטפורמות והתשתיות בשונה מאפל. לא נראה לי כרגע שהיא מתכוונת לשנות את האסטרטגיה הזו. הלחם והחמאה של גוגל או המוצר האסטרטגי ביותר שלה הוא מנוע החיפוש. גם בעולם הצומח של הטלפונים החכמים נדרש מנוע חיפוש. החלק השני של הפוסט יתייחס למנוע החיפוש. ועוד הערה שלא קשורה באופן ישיר: חברה אחרת, אורקל עשתה שינוי מיצרן תוכנה ליצרן תוכנה וחומרה כתוצאה מרכישת חברת סאן. אם מעניין אותך את מוזמנת לקרוא פוסטים שכתבתי על רכישת סאן על ידי אורקל.צרפתי שני קישורים לדוגמה http://avirosenthal.blogspot.com/2009/04/vendors-survival-sun-is-red-oracle-to.html
http://avirosenthal.blogspot.com/2009/09/oracle-sun-hardware-easy-to-say-and.html
.

Popular posts from this blog

The mainframe: still alive and kicking

Recently, I was interviewed by  Pcon   (unfortunately the link points to an Hebrew only site) as part of debriefing on Legacy Systems.  Pcon is an Israeli company investigating IT topics by quoting professional articles and interviewing experts. They publish the results of the investigations including practical recommendations. This post is mainly about topics raised by me during the interview, but not included in the debriefing, which will be published.    What are Legacy Systems? The term Legacy Systems refers to old application systems and/or veteran technologies still in use.  Usually, the term Legacy Systems is associated with: 1. Mainframe Hardware e.g. IBM System z and its Operating Systems or Proprietary Servers and Operating Systems such as HP Alpha and OpenVMS Operating System, IBM AS/400 and OS/400   Operating System. 2. Development and Production Environments, e.g. COBOL , Natural and DBMS systems such as Adabas  ...

Will Business and IT Aligned?

For decades we are talking about closing the gap between business and IT , but the gap is still as wide as it was. In the beginning of the ERP era, we focused on aligning Business Processes and Core Systems, but in most enterprises we failed. SOA was the next alignment promise: defining the SOA Services in Business boundaries instead of Technical boundaries, should narrow the gap. However, despite of SOA Business Value ( Agility and Reuse )  in most enterprises,  the large Business-IT Gap remained as large as it was.  The IT Community aimed at the next alignment attempt: SOA is technical and BPM is its Business related complement.  Will the current BPM based alignment attempt succeed? I do not know, but Nick Heath's article  titled: Stop doing what the vendors tell you, CIOs told , published in  Tech Republic , suggests that the root of the problem is not Technological .   Stop Doing What the vendors Tell You Nick Heath's article is based ...

Vendors Survival: Will Software AG Survive until 2019?

This post is another post in the Vendors Survival series following posts on Microsoft , Google , HP , Sun and EMC . On July 14 th Software AG and IDS Scheer announced that Software AG is going to take over IDS Scheer . The intended acquisition is an opportunity to add another post in my Vendors Survival posts series. A brief history of Software AG Mainframe products Software AG is larger than any German software company except SAP . It was established in the Mainframe age (in 1969). I worked with many customers, who used and some of them are still using, its two flagship products Adabas and Natural . Although these products support many platforms, their main platform is IBM Mainframe. Adabas is a database and Natural is a development environment. Like other pairs of Database and Development Environment in the mainframe environment (e.g. Ideal and Datacom , Mantis and Supra) build by the same vendor, they are tied together. As a result, although it is possible t...